Dear Editor,

This weekend, the Tigers played a great game against Florida State University. Despite Saturday’s triumphant win, I was ashamed and embarrassed to call myself a Clemson fan that day. I witnessed behavior unbecoming of fans and students of this great university. While waiting to go to the hill, I became lost in a mob of pushing, yelling, angry students just behind Howard’s Rock that required police assistance. I saw a young, disabled boy and his family trampled by students who could think of nothing but their coveted spot on the hill. I saw tear-streaked faces of smaller students swallowed in the wake of that mob. I saw trashed tailgate sites and vomit-stained shirts, and who could have missed the profane mocking FSU cheer to the tune of the Seminole’s own victory song? This weekend was supposed to be “Lock it up for your Tigers.” How about next time, “Show some class, Tiger fans?”

Hannah Sykes

Editor of the University Tiger:

I am saddened to see that you have published the above-mentioned ad on page A6 of today’s issue.

Prominent Holocaust denier Bradley Smith has made much of the fact that he recently succeeded in having an advertisement placed in the Harvard Crimson newspaper on Sept 8. Now he is crowing about having duped your paper as well.

The ad purports to ask the penetrating question on why Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his “Crusade for Europe,” did not mention Auschwitz or the gas chambers.

The Holocaust History Project (http://www.holocaust-history.org), a free archive of documents, photographs, recordings, and essays regarding the Holocaust, including direct refutation of Holocaust-denial, has seen Mr Smith in action before. And we wish to reply to his duplicity this time as well.

Indeed, one might ask, why did Eisenhower not mention the gas chambers? Why did he not do an extensive exposé on the Holocaust? To the extent that he causes people to ask themselves these questions, and thereby he hopes, begin to wonder about how true the Holocaust story really is, Smith accomplishes his goal. His goal, like that of all Holocaust deniers, is deception, dishonest and duplicity.

What this boils down to is Smith hoping people will ask themselves the wrong question and derive therefrom the wrong conclusion. This is not new to the Holocaust History Project. Indeed, we have already described the intellectual dishonesty of revisionism, as deniers prefer to describe their denial. And this is not our first run-in with Mr Smith. He and his dishonesty, and in fact his hypocrisy have been observed many times.

But in fact, the better question would be this. Why would one expect Eisenhower to have discussed the gas chambers or the Holocaust? Eisenhower’s book is a military history of the military strategy employed to defeat the Axis in World War II, with some autobiographical information sprinkled throughout, from the perspective of the Supreme Allied Commander in western Europe. It did not purport to be an all-encompassing history of every aspect of the war, nor should it have been. Indeed, its major focus was on the Allied side, not the Axis.

There would be no more reason for Eisenhower to discuss the gas chabers than there would be Raul Hilberg to discuss the military strategy regarding the Battle of the Bulge in his “Destruction of the European Jews”. Smith would have us believe that because a military historian does not discuss a non-military event in his book, the event did not occur. This is merely a variation on the “no written Hitler order for the Final solution means there was no order at all”. It is, in a word, rubbish.

Let us examine just a few factoids that might enlighten things a bit.

- Eisenhower never visited a death camp.

- The death camps were in eastern Europe, particularly Poland. Eisenhower never got east of Berlin.

- Eisenhower never visited a camp with a gas chamber.

- In fact, the only camp he ever visited was Ohrdruf, a sub-camp of Buchenwald. Ohrdruf did not have a gas chamber.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohrdruf_concentration_camp

- A search of the index of Crusade in Europe reveals no mention of Hermann Goering, the head of the Luftwaffe. Presumably, according to Mr Smith, Goering never existed.

- The same result occurs if one searches for Joseph Goebbels, the Reich Propaganda minister. Presumably, he never existed either.

- And finally, Auschwitz is not mentioned. Apparently, it did not exist either.

Those of us who have read a great deal of denier material are not surprised by this. Smith employs an argument based on a false premise. That shouldn’t be surprising. He is after all head of an organization called Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH) that routinely censors its web discussion page.

I fully expect that readers of your newspaper are too intelligent to be taken in by this nonsense.

On behalf of the Holocaust History Project

Gord McFee

Letters should be no longer than 400 words. Feedback from our website may also be considered for publication. Submissions must include the author’s name, number or email address, hometown, class, and major. All submissions will be checked from auhenicity and mya be edited for clarity and grammar. Space considerations may result in submissions being held for later publication. The Tiger reserves the right to print or edit all submissions.